← Back · ← Home · ← Back to list

The Two Faces of Mao Zedong

EAI Sarangbang Students' Beijing Expedition Travelogue: The Youth of Sarangbang Embrace Beijing

Category
EAI Sarangbang Excursions
Published
May 8, 2014
sarangbang_2_ch7_cover.png
sarangbang_2_ch7_cover.png

Woo Hee-won · Ewha Womans University

Introduction: Chairman Mao Memorial Hall

In 1976, after Mao Zedong's

death

(毛主席紀念館)

(Mao Zedong)

is a place where his embalmed body is enshrined and open to the public. As such, it is a place where one can feel Mao Zedong's final moments and his influence that continues even after his death. The path to meeting Mao Zedong was arduous. From the moment we included Chairman Mao Memorial Hall in our itinerary, we could not help but worry about the 2-3 hour wait to enter. Even the day before, after reading reviews (or rather, warnings) about Chairman Mao Memorial Hall online, I had to urge the tired others to wake up early the next day to minimize the waiting time. It was already nearing midnight.

Photograph

In addition to the 2-3 hour wait to enter, the process of entering Chairman Mao Memorial Hall was strict and demanding. No items, including cameras, were allowed inside, and once inside, visitors had to move in an orderly fashion under the guidance of public security officers. Care had to be taken to keep voices from becoming too loud. Wearing hats was also not permitted. For foreign visitors, passports were essential for identification.

You might react with disbelief. Why are all these cumbersome procedures necessary? What kind of person was Mao Zedong that countless Chinese people flock to Chairman Mao Memorial Hall to see his body even after his death?

On the day we visited Chairman Mao Memorial Hall, we were, as expected, running late due to the strenuous schedule from the previous day. To avoid further delays and potentially longer waits, a few of us decided to take a taxi ahead of time to secure a spot in line. When we hailed a taxi and told the driver our destination, he briefly explained in Chinese that Chairman Mao Memorial Hall was "no open," perhaps out of consideration for our inability to speak Chinese. The three of us who left early were bewildered, but we agreed to go to the memorial hall ourselves to assess the situation. Fortunately, the memorial hall was not closed that day. The taxi driver had simply misunderstood because there were very few people in line.

As the taxi driver had said, upon arriving at Chairman Mao Memorial Hall, we found no long queue of people waiting to enter. Although many people were gathered around the entrance, contrary to our concerns, the long lines seen online were nowhere to be found. Apart from a brief wait in the cold weather for the others who left later, we were able to visit Mao Zedong much more easily than expected. While the number of people was still not small in our view, we couldn't understand why the infamous long queues were absent on the day we visited. Could it be that we had a special connection with Mao Zedong?

The Two Faces of Mao Zedong

Much like the stringent conditions for entering Chairman Mao Memorial Hall, Mao Zedong himself is a figure whose true nature is difficult to approach. This is because Mao Zedong's actions during his lifetime are subject to conflicting evaluations today. We cannot help but feel confused by the contradictory and dualistic aspects of a single individual.

Before the founding of the People's Republic of China, he was a possessor of strong national consciousness and an outstanding revolutionary. Furthermore, during the Anti-Japanese War, he demonstrated a judgment and analytical ability that accurately predicted not only the current situation but also future developments. However, after the founding of the People's Republic of China, his actions resulted in more harm than good. The Cultural Revolution, in particular, which took place from 1966 to 1976, was an event that occurred entirely under Mao Zedong's responsibility. The mistakes made by Mao Zedong in this single event alone are immense. Not only did it result in a vast number of casualties, the exact figures of which have yet to be precisely calculated, but its brutality was truly shocking. The positive aspects of Mao Zedong prior to the founding of the nation lost their significance during the Cultural Revolution.

Photograph

So, how should we evaluate Mao Zedong? First, let us examine both sides of Mao Zedong's dual nature. This article aims to present Mao Zedong's merits and demerits in a balanced manner, without unduly emphasizing any particular aspect. How each individual chooses to view Mao Zedong is entirely up to them, and there is no single correct answer.

On Protracted War

Among Mao Zedong's numerous writings, "On Protracted War" demonstrates his keen judgment of reality and analytical skills regarding the political situation before the founding of the People's Republic of China. Mao Zedong wrote this essay in May 1938, during the height of Japan's invasion of China. In this work, Mao Zedong raises the questions, "Why a protracted war?" and "Why will the final victory belong to China?" and provides answers. In his answers, Mao Zedong coolly and accurately compares and analyzes the situations and characteristics of Japan and China, the reactions of the international community, and the changes in circumstances over time. Let us examine the specific answers he presented.

• Japan's strengths lie in its powerful military, economy, and political organization.

However, Japan will face international opposition that outweighs international aid,

due to its regressive and barbaric imperialist nature.

7. The Two Faces of Mao Zedong

• In contrast, China is much weaker than Japan in terms of military strength and economic power.

However, China possesses a vast territory and abundant resources and population,

which will become advantages in a protracted war.

Furthermore, China's Anti-Japanese War represents progress and justice,

so significant international aid can be expected.

• In the initial stages, Japan's powerful military and economic might will inflict defeats upon China.

However, Mao Zedong states that one should not be consumed by such defeats.

As time progresses, the situation will change, and at that point, Japan's

weaknesses will become more pronounced, while China's strengths will grow significantly.

Consequently, the probability of China achieving victory will increase (Mao Zedong 1989, 207-253).

How do you perceive Mao Zedong's judgment of the situation and analysis of reality in 1938, during the midst of the Second Sino-Japanese War? If you think, "Is it that difficult?", consider it from a different perspective. We know today that Japan was defeated. But what about in 1938? Was it easy to predict Japan's defeat? Think about the present. For example, consider the current relationship between China and the United States. Accurately predicting the relationship between China and the United States in five or ten years in broad terms is by no means easy. Mao Zedong's prediction of China's victory in the Sino-Japanese War in 1938 was also likely not an easy task. One might still question whether Mao Zedong's predictions were merely his delusions and whether their alignment with the actual course of history was mere coincidence. However, what Mao Zedong intended to convey through "On Protracted War" was not an unconditional victory for China. He clearly pointed out China's weaknesses and the inevitability of defeat for a certain period. Rather than dismissing it as mere delusion or coincidence, the judgment displayed in "On Protracted War" is highly balanced, realistic, and persuasive. Therefore, we must acknowledge Mao Zedong's outstanding abilities and achievements as demonstrated in "On Protracted War." Judging solely by this aspect, Mao Zedong can be described as a possessor of strong national consciousness, a revolutionary, and a strategist.

How do you perceive Mao Zedong's situational judgment and analytical skills at the time of the Second Sino-Japanese War in 1938? If you think, "Is it that difficult?", you might need to reconsider. We already know that Japan was defeated. But what about the situation in 1938? Was it easy to predict Japan's defeat? Think about the present. For example, consider the current relationship between China and the United States. It is never easy to accurately predict the relationship between China and the United States in the big picture five or ten years from now. Predicting China's victory in the Second Sino-Japanese War in 1938 was by no means an easy task for Mao Zedong. One might still question whether Mao Zedong's prediction was merely a delusion and whether its alignment with the actual course of history was mere coincidence. However, what Mao Zedong intended to convey through the theory of protracted war was not an unconditional victory for China. He clearly pointed out China's weaknesses and the inevitability of its defeat for a certain period. The judgment displayed by Mao Zedong in the theory of protracted war is highly balanced, realistic, and persuasive, making it difficult to dismiss it as mere delusion or coincidence. Therefore, we must acknowledge Mao Zedong's outstanding abilities and achievements as demonstrated in the theory of protracted war. Judging solely by these aspects, Mao Zedong can be described as a possessor of firm national consciousness, a revolutionary, and a strategist.

The Cultural Revolution

The aspect we will now examine will further complicate perspectives and stances on Mao Zedong. While "On Protracted War" can be explained as one of Mao Zedong's outstanding achievements and accomplishments, the Cultural Revolution, which marked his later years, is arguably his greatest failure. In fact, the Chinese Communist Party officially assesses Mao Zedong's merits and demerits at a 7:3 ratio. Before delving into the specifics of this ratio, it is important to note that even the Chinese Communist Party cannot unconditionally defend Mao Zedong, and this is precisely due to the Cultural Revolution. The Cultural Revolution left profound scars and had a tremendous impact on the entire Chinese society, including its leadership.

The Cultural Revolution was an event that occurred solely based on Mao Zedong's decision, and the full responsibility lies with him. Therefore, understanding Mao Zedong is essential to comprehending the Cultural Revolution. Furthermore, to gain a balanced perspective on Mao Zedong, it is imperative to examine and understand the Cultural Revolution, which dominated his later years. Why did Mao Zedong make such an extreme choice? How should we understand the Cultural Revolution? These two questions, though seemingly different, are closely related.

For instance, the French scholar Marie-Claire Bergere defined the Cultural Revolution as "Mao Zedong's process of regaining power," or a "power struggle." However, it was not solely driven by Mao Zedong's lust for power. Even Bergere understood the Cultural Revolution as being "to prevent the revolution from declining and falling into revisionism" from Mao Zedong's perspective (Bergere 2009, 184-185). Clearly, Mao Zedong's actions in the decision-making and implementation of the Cultural Revolution were irrational, cruel, and dictatorial. One might think that his erratic behavior would be easier to understand if it were solely due to an insatiable desire for power. However, if he carried out such actions not just for power but for the sake of revolution, it raises many questions.

The key keyword describing Mao Zedong would be 'revolution.' This characteristic of Mao Zedong can also partly explain why he initiated the Cultural Revolution. However, it is important to note that even though the Cultural Revolution stemmed from Mao Zedong's continuous pursuit of revolution, this does not negate the violence and Mao Zedong's mistakes that occurred during the event. Rather, as the purpose of this article was to showcase Mao Zedong's extreme duality, I wanted to provide the minimal link that could connect these two extremes. We have now examined Mao Zedong's differing aspects as revealed in "On Protracted War" and the Cultural Revolution. The evaluation of Mao Zedong is now up to you, the reader.

Conclusion

My feelings were complex while studying Mao Zedong, but never more so than when I left Chairman Mao Memorial Hall. I am still unsure whether it was simply the unsettling feeling of having seen someone's corpse, or if it was due to the fact that, although not as crowded as we had heard, a considerable number of Chinese people were still visiting the site. The scene was indeed extraordinary. This is because, for Koreans, there is no figure whose corpse is preserved eternally. I could not find any reason why a historical figure, even one who significantly influenced history and the nation, should have their corpse venerated. This is especially true given the egregious mistakes made in his later years. Perhaps this reflects my strong perspective as a Korean.

As I left the memorial hall, questions continued to arise. Why did Mao Zedong's body remain on display, while Deng Xiaoping's did not? What do Chinese people actually think when they see Mao Zedong's body? Are they, as intended by the Chinese Communist Party, impressed by Mao Zedong's achievements and grateful to him? Or do they feel nothing at all? Is there anyone else who feels as conflicted as I do? What can we feel and think when we observe a phenomenon where a single individual has such a colossal impact on a society or nation? What about others who may be reading this? Do you feel like visiting the Chairman Mao Memorial Hall to encounter Mao Zedong? ■ References Kojima Shinji and Maruyama Matsuyuki. 1988. "Chūgoku Kindai Shi" (Modern Chinese History). Seoul: Jisik Sanupsa. Riversal, Kenneth. 2013. "Governing China: Understanding Contemporary Chinese Politics." Seoul: Simsan. Mao Zedong. Translated by Lee Hee-ok. 1989. "Mao Zedong Xuanji I" (Selected Works of Mao Zedong I). Seoul: Jeonin.

Meisner, Maurice. 2004. "Mao's China and After" Vol. 1-2. Seoul: Isan. Berger, Marie-Claire. 2009. "Histoire de la Chine contemporaine: le Parti, l'État, la société" (Contemporary Chinese History: The Party, the State, Society).

Seoul: Simsan Publishing.

Blecher, Marc. 2001. "China: Against the Tide." Seoul: Dolbegae. Schram, Stuart R. 1979. "Mao Zedong." Seoul: Dure.

Amako Satoshi. 2003. "50 Years of the People's Republic of China." Seoul: Iljogak.

Jeon Ri-gun. 2012. "The Mao Zedong Era and the Post-Mao Zedong Era 1949-2009" Vol. 1-2.

Paju: Hanul Academy.

Snow, Edgar. 2013. "Red Star Over China." Seoul: Dure.

Spencer, Jonathan D. 1998. "In Search of Contemporary China" Vol. 1-2. Seoul: Isan. Appendix

• EAI Sarangbang 2013 Fall Semester Program • EAI Sarangbang 2nd Term Participants Speak

- What is "EAI Sarangbang"?

- What is "EAI Sarangbang Expedition Trip"? EAI Sarangbang 2013 Fall Semester Program "Architects of East Asian Order: From Ancient Tianxia to Future Complexity" Week 1 Architects of East Asian Order Week 2 Origins of Tianxia Order I Week 3 Formation of Tianxia Order Week 4 Development of Tianxia Order Week 5 Thesis Research Proposal Presentation Week 6 Transmission and Transformation of 'Jinsu' Civilization Week 7 The Myth of Japanese Pan-Asianism Week 8 Cold War Order I: The Tragedy of the Korean War Week 9 Mid-term Research Paper Presentation

Week 10 Cold War Order II: Détente between the US and China and the Pros and Cons of the July 4th South-North Joint Communiqué Week 11 Complex Order I: The Rise of China

12th Week Complex Order II: The Future in the US-China Era

13th Week Complex Order III: The Aesthetics of Constructing a New East Asian Order; 14th Week Research Paper Draft Presentation

15th Week Beijing Excursion

Photo

EAI Sarangbang Season 2 Participants Speak: What is "EAI Sarangbang"? Do you know about Park Gyu-su's Sarangbang? It was a study room created by Park Gyu-su in the 19th century, a period of upheaval, to foster future generations. EAI Sarangbang carries on this spirit, nurturing talents who will open a new era. Here, you can learn profound wisdom from Professor Ha Young-sun, who is ahead of his time. You can also engage in deep conversations with friends who contemplate the future together. A semester is a short time, yet it can also be a long period that transforms each student's life. The weekly seminars that seem endless, independent personal research, and field trips outside the Sarangbang are all part of a semester meticulously prepared. You can also make it even more fruitful yourselves. EAI Sarangbang awaits your interest and participation as you dream of the future. ... Kim Ji-eun

A space where Professor Ha Young-sun and the young minds of the 21st century gather to discuss the new world order that will soon emerge with China's rise. A space for social science where insights that attempt to read the complexities of the times breathe, moving beyond social science based solely on quantitative methodologies. ... Jeon Na-num EAI Sarangbang Season 2 Participants Speak What is scholarship? What does it mean to study? Anyone who has ever asked these questions will find their answers here. Through Professor Ha Young-sun's lectures, high-level reading materials, and hands-on field trips, I naturally posed these questions to myself and spent 14 weeks gaining answers in a way I could never have experienced elsewhere. ... Woo Hee-won

Photo

EAI Sarangbang Season 2 Participants Speak During the EAI Sarangbang program, students prepare by writing a pre-reading journal to organize their thoughts while studying materials carefully selected by Chairman Ha Young-sun, and then engage in in-depth discussions with students from various schools over 14 weeks of seminars. This study method, which aligns with the perspectives of those involved in constructing the contemporary East Asian order, is a unique training method found only at EAI Sarangbang. The field trip following the seminar's conclusion is a culminating experience where students take turns guiding the group, introducing historical contexts and conditions of the visited sites from fresh perspectives to themselves and their peers. This serves as a truly special experience that marks the triumphant conclusion of the 14-week training. ... Ji Hye-soo

Photo

EAI Sarangbang Season 2 Participants Speak What is the "EAI Sarangbang Field Trip"?

Photo

The history of China came alive within the National Museum. The artifacts in the museum were similar to, yet distinctly different from, the Goryeo and Joseon artifacts, leaving a deep impression. Although I am not entirely sure, Goryeo and Joseon aesthetics felt more refined and followed a certain order, while Chinese artifacts, influenced by various regions worldwide, seemed more irregular and diverse. I am once again grateful to Hye-su for so effectively explaining this international facet of China at the National Museum. ... Jeon Na-num EAI Sarangbang Season 2 Participants Speak Actually, I had visited the National Museum alone with the intention of staying from morning until closing time, so it wasn't an unfamiliar place. However, Hye-su's surprisingly clear and insightful explanations made it feel like a completely new experience. I particularly remember the detailed insights gained from distinguishing between dishes for drinking and eating. Museums truly come alive with a story. This might be the first time a group museum visit felt so rewarding. In any case, it was a five-star first day!

... Lee So-young

Photo

EAI Sarangbang Season 2 Participants Speak

Photo

The National Museum of China, for a country with such a long history and vast territory, felt overwhelming. Where should I even begin? Fortunately, Hye-su highlighted the key aspects of each era, making the visit much more meaningful. The guide's brilliance truly shone as closing time approached. "This is from the prosperous Song Dynasty. Pottery is the highlight!" "Now, for the Ming Dynasty, embark on a journey to find gold, everyone!" We viewed artifacts from different dynasties, and throughout the process, I felt a sense of spatial vastness. Looking at seemingly similar artifacts displayed side-by-side, one from Sichuan and another from Henan, I imagined how these objects traversed such a wide territory. Indeed, during the Tang and Song dynasties, foreigners began to appear in large numbers. EAI Sarangbang Season 2 Participants Speak

Photo

Witnessing the encounters and mixing of people within this spatiotemporal context made me reflect on how we, visiting the National Museum of China at this very moment, will be remembered in the future. ... Kim Ji-eun

The Chinese National Museum, my first visit, was as vast and magnificent as the Chinese continent itself. We saw artifacts from the Xia and Shang dynasties up to the Song and Tang dynasties, and there wasn't enough time to see everything, highlighting China's immense cultural heritage. In this vast space, our special guide(?)'s sense of direction shone brightly. Her storytelling, especially when discussing Empress Wu Zetian, was on par with a professional narrator. The sheer scale of the museum is something I will never forget. ... Lee Gyu-won

Photo

The Young Minds

of Sarangbang

Supporters of the East Asia Institute

Kang Guk-yeon, Kwon Yong-sun, Kim Bong-ha, Kim Yong-su, Kim Jong-hwi, Kim Hyung-jae, Moon Jin-seong, Kang Gyu-hyeong, Kwon Ji-won, Kim Sang-rae, Kim Yong-jun, Kim Jun, Kim Hyung-jun, Min Byung-moon, Kang Myung-hoon, Geum Young-soo, Kim Sang-woo, Kim Yong-jik, Kim Jun-hong, Kim Hyung-chan, Min Seon-sik, Kang Moon-seon, Ki Eui-seok, Kim Seok-jun, Kim Yong-ho, Kim Jun-hee, Kim Hyo-shin, Min Seon-young, Kang Young-jun, Kim Geon-min, Kim Sung-kyung, Kim Won, Kim Ji-young, Kim Hee-dong, Min Young-seok, Kang Yun-gwan, Kim Geon-i, Kim Sung-han, Kim Won, Kim Ji-yoon, Kim Hee-jung, Park Kyung-soo, Kang Eun-kyung, Kim Geon-ho, Kim Se-jong, Kim Won, Kim Ji-jeong, Kim Hee-jin, Park Keun-ah, Kang Chan-soo, Kim Kyung-soon, Kim Su-jin, Kim Yu-sang, Kim Ji-tae, Na Sang-won, Park Dae-soon, Kang Hyun-wook, Kim Kyung-ji, Kim Seung-bin, Kim Yun-ho, Kim Jin, Nam Gye-seung, Park Dong-sun, Go Byung-hee, Kim Gwan-yong, Kim Seung-hye, Kim Yun-hee, Kim Jin-ki, Nam Yun-ho, Park Mi-na, Go Seung-soo, Kim Kwang-deok, Kim Si-yeon, Kim Eun-gi, Kim Jin-ah, Nam Tae-hee, Park Mi-young, Go Seung-yeon, Kim Guk-hyeong, Kim Shin-sook, Kim Eun-seon, Kim Jin-young, No Young-hoon, Park Byung-woo, Go Eun-hee, Kim Ki-jeong, Kim Yang-gyu, Kim Eun-sook, Kim Jin-hyeok, No Ik-sang, Park Sa-ra-suhyeon, Go Hyeong-sik, Kim Gi-jun, Kim Yeon-ok, Kim Eun-young, Kim Chang-soo, No Jae-kyung, Park Sang-min, Go Hye-sun, Kim Nam-i, Kim Young-gon, Kim In-seop, Kim Chang-wook, No Ho-sik, Park Sang-jun, Gong Seong-won, Kim Nam-hee, Kim Young-gu, Kim In-hye, Kim Jeong, Kim Chang-won, No Hwan-gil, Park Seok-won, Gong Jeong-moon, Kim Dong-geon, Kim Young-mi, Kim Jeong, Kim Pan-seok, Ryu Jae-hee, Park Sung-man, Gong Chang-wi, Kim Dong-eun, Kim Young-seop, Kim Jeong-seop, Kim Ha-jeong, Ma Geum-hoe, Park So-yeon, Gu Beop-mo, Kim Man-ho, Kim Young-ho, Kim Jeong-soo, Kim Han-gi, Ma Jeong-jae, Park Su-jin, Gu Sang-hwan, Kim Mi-young, Kim Ye-ja, Kim Jeong-on, Kim Hyun-seong, Myeong Jeong-mo, Park Soon-hwi, Gu Yun-jeong, Kim Byeong-guk, Kim Yong-gyu, Kim Jeong-wook, Kim Hyun-jeon, Moon Seong-hwan, Park Yeon-ho, Gu Jun-seo, Kim Byeong-pyo, Kim Yong-nam, Kim Jeong-eun, Kim Hyung-seok, Moon Yun-seong, Park Young-ryeol, Kwon Se-rin, Kim Byeong-hee, Kim Yong-ryeol, Kim Jeong-ha, Kim Hyung-woon, Moon Ji-wook, Park Yong-jun

These are the individuals who have supported the East Asia Institute: Park Jang-ho, Seo Mi-hye, Shin Myung-cheol, Oh Mi-young, Yoon Jeong-rim, Lee Sang-won, Lee Jae-kwan, Park Jae-si, Seo Bong-kyo, Shin Bo-hee, Oh Se-jeong, Yoon Jeong-seon, Lee Sang-ju, Lee Jae-seop, Park Jae-jun, Seo Sang-min, Shin Sang-hwa, Oh Cheol, Yoon Chang-min, Lee Sang-hyun, Lee Jeong-min, Park Jeong-seop, Seo Young-min, Shin Seong-soo, Ok Woo-seok, Yoon Hye-seong, Lee Sang-hyup, Lee Jeong-eun, Park Jeong-ho, Seo Yong-ju, Shin Seong-yong, Woo Mi-kyung, Eun Jong-hak, Lee Sang-ho, Lee Jeong-ho, Park Jong-cheol, Seo Eun-sook, Shin Seong-ho, Woo Byeong-ik, Lee Gyeong-ae, Lee Seo-hyun, Lee Jeong-hwan, Park Jun-hyung, Seo Ui-seok, Shin Young-jun, Won Jong-sook, Lee Gon-su, Lee Seok-hwan, Lee Jeong-hee, Park Jin-won, Seo Jeong-won, Shin Young-hwan, Won Jong-ae, Lee Gyu-ho, Lee Seon-ju, Lee Jong-su, Park Chan-geun, Seo Chang-sik, Shin Yun-kyung, Yu Ri-na, Lee Geun, Lee Seon-hee, Lee Jong-jin, Park Chan-seon, Seo Hee-jeong, Shin Jun-hee, Yu Mun-jong, Lee Geun-woo, Lee Seong-ryang, Lee Jong-ho, Park Chan-wook, Seon Seung-hoon, Shim Yun-bo, Yu Seung-hoon, Lee Gi-hwang, Lee So-min, Lee Ju-yeon, Park Chan-hee, Seong Jeong-eun, Ahn Geon-young, Yu Uk-sang, Lee Nae-young, Lee So-young, Lee Ju-heon, Park Chang-ki, So Chi-hyung, Ahn Yong-chan, Yu Jeong-seok, Lee Dal-won, Lee Suk-jong, Lee Jung-gu, Park Chang-wan, Son Dae-hyun, Ahn Jun-mo, Yu Ji-yeong, Lee Dong-seon, Lee Seung-ju, Lee Ji-won, Park Cheon-bong, Son Myeong-jeong, Ahn Jung-ik, Yu Chang-soo, Lee Dong-wook, Lee Seung-hwa, Lee Ji-hee, Park Hyeon, Son Yeol, Ahn Hyun-jeong, Yu Heung-min, Lee Dong-chan, Lee Seung-hoon, Lee Jin-ah, Park Hyeong-min, Son Jae-ki, Ahn Hyeon-ho, Yuk Eun-gyeong, Lee Dong-hoon, Lee Si-yeon, Lee Chang-won, Park Hwi-rak, Song Gi-chun, Yang Soon-hwa, Yoon Min-young, Lee Ma-ri, Lee Shin-hwa, Lee Chang-heon, Bang Hyo-eun, Song Woo-yeop, Yang Ju-myung, Yoon Byung-seok, Lee Mi-hye, Lee Yeo-hee, Lee Chung-hyung, Bae Gi-wook, Song Won-jin, Yang Ho-sil, Yoon Sang-min, Lee Min-gyo, Lee Yeong-bok, Lee Tae-seok, Bae Wi-seop, Song Ji-yeon, Um Chan-seop, Yoon Seok-min, Lee Min-ryong, Lee Yeong-ju, Lee Tae-hwan, Baek Song-hyun, Shin Gwan-soo, Yeo Dong-chan, Yoon Yeong-doo, Lee Beom-ju, Lee Woo-gwan, Lee Hae-wan, Baek Jin-gyu, Shin Gwon-sik, Ye Byung-min, Yoon Yong-jib, Lee Byeong-in, Lee Won-jong, Lee Hae-wook, Baek Hye-young, Shin Dong-won, Oh Myeong-hak, Yoon Woo-sung, Lee Bong-jae, Lee Yoon-mi, Lee Hyeon-ok, Byeon Gi-ho, Shin Dong-jun, Oh Mi-soon, Yoon Jae-hoon, Lee Sang-gu, Lee In-ok, Lee Hyeon-woo.

Im Myung-soo, Jeon Kyung-soo, Jeong Rang-ho, Jeong Hyun-cheol, Cha Guk-rin, Choi Eun-hye, Han Jun-hee, Lee Hye-min, Jang Won-ho, Jeong Moo-seop, Cho Gyu-wan, Cha Dong-min, Choi Jae-won, Han Ji-hyun, Lee Hye-sun, Jang Eui-young, Jeong Byung-gap, Cho Dong-hyun, Cha Du-hyun, Choi Jong-ho, Han Jin-soo, Lee Ho-jun, Jang Jae-hoon, Jeong Bong-hwa, Cho Sang-ho, Cha Soon-man, Choi Joon-won, Han Ha-ram, Lee Hong-gu, Jang Jun-hyeok, Jeong Seok-hee, Jo Seong-wook, Chae Gyu-ho, Choi Jin-won, Han Hong-il, Lee Hong-gyu, Jang Ji-sang, Jeong Ah-young, Jo Seong-jae, Chae Seong-il, Choi Cheol-won, Heo Se-hong, Lee Hong-mi, Jang Jin-ho, Jeong Yeon-tae, Jo So-young, Chae Hye-kyung, Choi Hyun-jong, Hong Byeong-cheol, Lee Hong-jae, Jang Tae-gon, Jeong Young-guk, Jo Eun-hee, Choi Kang, Chu Ki-neung, Hong Seong-woo, Lee Hyo-jae, Jang Hoon, Jeong Young-jin, Jo Chang-geol, Choi Geon, Ha Young-sun, Hong Seong-won, Lee Hee-jeong, Jang Hee-jin, Jeong Yong-hwa, Cho Hyun-sun, Choi Gwan-ju, Ha Young-ho, Hong Seung-bok, Im Sang-gyun, Jeon Myung-seon, Jeong Yun-seok, Ju Mi-ya, Choi Dae-seok, Han Gye-sook, Hong Ju-hee, Im Seong-bin, Jeon Myung-ho, Jeong Yun-ho, Ju Young-ah, Choi Dong-gyu, Han Geum-hyun, Hong Ho-young, Im Seong-wook, Jeon Sang-in, Jeong Jae-gwan, Ju Jin-gyun, Choi Byung-gyu, Han Sang-won, Hwang Seok-hee, Im Seong-hak, Jeon Young-pyeong, Jeong Jae-ho, Ju Han, Choi Byung-jun, Han Sang-cheol, Hwang Sung-jin, Im Jae-hwan, Jeon Eun-kyung, Jeong Ju-yeon, Ji Man-soo, Choi Shin-rim, Han Seok-hee, Hwang Su, Im Ji-soon, Jeon Jae-seong, Jeong Ju-hwan, Ji Byung-geun, Choi Shin-young, Han Seon-ho, Hwang Ui-sook, Im Hyun-mo, Jeon Jin-ho, Jeong Jin-young, Ji Hye-ri, Choi Young-ah, Han Seung-hye, Hwang Joon-ho, Im Hong-jae, Jeon Hye-kyung, Jeong Hae-il, Jin Seon-hee, Choi Young-an, Han Yong-seop, Hwang Ji-hwan, Jang Dong-woo, Jeon Hye-jin, Jeong Hyun-woon, Jin Jae-wook, Choi Yun-jun, Han Jeong-won, Stephen Ranger, Jang Se-rin, Jeong Gi-yong, Jeong Hyun-joo, Jin Ji-woon, EAI Publications, EAI Diplomatic Security Grand Strategy Series, EAI Public Opinion Analysis Series

1. Grand Strategy for Korean Diplomacy in the 21st Century: Building a Networked State; 1. Dilemmas and Choices of the Roh Moo-hyun Administration: 2. Vision and Tasks of the ROK-US Alliance: Public Opinion, Minority Government, and Policy Choices

3. North Korean Nuclear Crisis and Peace on the Korean Peninsula; 2. Korean National Identity and Korean Politics

4. China Risk 2020: Medium- to Long-Term Forecast and Risk Analysis of the Chinese Economy; 3. Changing Korean Voters: Panel Study of the May 31 Local Elections

Risk Analysis; 5. ROK-US Security Cooperation in an Era of Transition: Rebuilding Command Relations for the Future; 4. Changing Korean Voters II: Panel Study of the 2007 Presidential Election

5. ROK-US Security Cooperation in an Era of Transition: Rebuilding Command Relations for the Future; 4. Changing Korean Voters II: Panel Study of the 2007 Presidential Election

Command Relations for the Future; 5. Changing Korean Voters III: Panel Study of the 2008 General Election

6. East Asian Community: Myth and Reality; 5. Changing Korean Voters III: Panel Study of the 2008 General Election; 7. The New Alliance of the 21st Century: From Cold War to Complexity; 6. Changing Korean Voters IV: Panel Study of the 2010 Local Elections

8. North Korea 2032: Coevolutionary Strategy for Advancement; 6. Changing Korean Voters IV: Panel Study of the 2010 Local Elections; 9. Talking About China's Future: Prospects and Outlook for a Global Superpower; 7. Koreans, Who Are We?: Korean Identity Through Public Opinion Surveys

Prospects for a Global Superpower; 10. Japan and East Asia: Regional Cooperation and Community Building; 7. Koreans, Who Are We?: Korean Identity Through Public Opinion Surveys; 8. Changing Korean Voters V: Panel Study of the 2012 General and Presidential Elections

11. Crisis and Complexity: The World Order After the Economic Crisis; 8. Changing Korean Voters V: Panel Study of the 2012 General and Presidential Elections; 12. East Asian International Politics: From History to Theory

13. US-China Relations 2025

14. Ha Young-sun's International Politics Columns 1991-2011, Vol. I; EAI English Books

15. Ha Young-sun's International Politics Columns 1991-2011, Vol. II; 1. Between Compliance and Conflict: East Asia, 16. Global Development Cooperation Governance and Korea; Latin America, and the “New” Pax Americana; 17. North-South Economic Cooperation Strategy for Coevolution: Conservatives and Progressives Consider Together; 2. Power and Security in Northeast Asia: Shifting Strategies

Strategies; 3. Party Politics in East Asia: Citizens, Elections,

18. Ten Major Tasks for Korean Diplomacy 2020: Complexity and Coevolution; 4. Collective Violence in Indonesia

EAI 민주대전략시리즈 4. Collective Violence in Indonesia

EAI Democratic Grand Strategy Series

1. Conditions for Presidential Success I: Role, Authority, Responsibility; 5. Public Diplomacy and Soft Power in East Asia; 2. Conditions for Presidential Success II: Retrospect and Proposals; 6. The Park Chung Hee Era: The Transformation of South Korea; 3. Conditions for Political Reform Success: From Power Struggle to Policy Competition; 7. Future of North Korea 2032: Coevolutionary Strategy for the Advancement

Policy Competition; 4. Political and Parliamentary Reform: Retrospect and Prospects from the Field

Prospects from the Field

5. Conditions for Parliamentary Success: Ethics and Policy; EAI English Journals

6. Democracy That Revives the Economy; Journal of East Asian Studies (SSCI Indexed) 2001-

7. Decentralized Constitution: The Path to Advancement; 8. Conditions for Successful Presidential Transition: 67 Days Determine 5 Years

Determine 5 Years

9. How Conservative Politics Survived: The History of the British Conservative Party

10. Second Act of Globalization: A New Vision for Korean Globalization; 11. Conditions for Presidential Success in 2013

12. Japan's Revival Leadership: Post-War Japan's Crisis and Reconstruction

12. Japan's Revival Leadership: Post-War Japan's Crisis and Reconstruction

and Reconstruction

*This text is an AI translation of an original written in Korean. Some translations or nuances may be inaccurate.

← Back · ← Home · ← Back to list