韩国民主主义叙事圆桌会议召开：“K-民主”新解（feat. 未来）

YouTube 链接 : https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ZCRgSnEFj2M

东亚研究所 (East Asia Institute: EAI) 作为“韩国民主主义叙事”项目的一部分，在国际民主联盟 (NDI) 的支持下，于2020年10月30日（周五）举办了题为“K-民主”新解（feat. 未来）的圆桌会议。此次圆桌会议旨在就韩国民主主义的未来愿景以及韩国在全球民主发展中的作用进行跨代际的意见交流和探讨，会议分为“第一场：政党民主主义的未来”和“第二场：公民民主主义的未来”。

此次活动汇集了东亚研究所高级研究员、成均馆大学教授李淑宗，以及参与“韩国民主主义叙事”项目的青年代表、国会议员和公民领袖等作为特邀嘉宾，共同分享和探讨了韩国民主主义的现状与未来。

第一场：政党民主主义的未来

主 持 前光明星市议会议员 李润静

嘉 宾 蝴蝶1020 代表 金东旼

        前国民力量党议员 金世渊

        《京乡新闻》记者 朴顺奉

        共同民主党议员 朴用镇

        时代转换党议员 赵正勋

        前共同民主党青年副发言人 朱弘飞

第二场：公民民主主义的未来

主 持 Young Trend 总监 金景东

嘉 宾 “为了明天”运营委员 金仁浩

        韩国共论论坛代表 朴泰淳

       《中央日报》记者 柳成云

        治理中心理事长 李亨龙

        高丽大学教授 郑在官

        Narra 联合代表 河泰旭

* 嘉宾按韩语字母顺序排列

负责人

李恩智，东亚研究所 (EAI) 研究员

第一场：政党民主主义的未来

第二场：公民民主主义的未来

综合讨论

视频脚本

嗯，现在在这么多项目里，民主主义的项目好像没有得到很好的推进，也没有什么成果出来，我们今年会推出相关项目。这次项目是我们在美国基金会的支持下，进行了四个月的合作。然后我们召集了青年、市民领袖、国会议员，组成了一个交流小组。金教授您在韩国民主主义方面，尤其是在地方议会方面，您做了很多研究。

因此，今天，我将介绍一下我们项目的背景，并请各位聚集在这里，就我们今天讨论的主题——“民主主义的未来”——发表意见。从今天的讨论来看，有很多参与者，也有很多市民提出了一些问题。我们还准备了问题卡，发给提问者。对于提问者，我们将在稍后给您一个回答。最后，主持人将总结今天的会议。

大家好，我是今天的主持人，我叫金润廷。大约两个月前，我们通过一个在线研讨会，探讨了个人主义的深化和相关争论。今天，我们想探讨“市民是如何看待民主主义的？”，特别是，我们想听听在座的各位，也就是在市民社会中活跃的各位，是如何看待民主主义的。今天能和这么多各位一起探讨，我感到非常荣幸。

所有来宾都认为，青年对政党民主主义的未来感到担忧。特别是，我们正在努力推进。但首先，我们先从“政党民主主义的未来”这个话题开始。我们过去在改革开放的民主党时期，经历了许多变化。虽然时间有限，但为了更广泛地听取各位的观点，请大家简要回答。现在，我们开始吧。第一位提问者是坐在我身边的金东旼先生。请您先回答这个问题。

第一个问题是：截至2020年10月30日，韩国民主主义是正在发展还是正处于危机之中？请您评价一下韩国民主主义，并谈谈您认为最重要的民主价值观是什么？请各位嘉宾先简要发表一下您的观点。如果时间允许，我们还可以通过问答环节进行更深入的探讨。

啊，是的。4。嗯，罪犯的初任问题，有些，有些，有些，因为惯例，因为惯例，不要说仁顺和2号，民主主义以及讨论，这是因为我们现在正在确定它是确定的还是不确定的，所以无法简短地回答。是的。社会上，正如您所说，这是一个制度性的完备的斗争，我们称之为“制度性不完备”。我们称之为“运气不好”。是的。即使是制度本身，也存在着整体的包容性、弹性，还有一些虚伪的方面，这些方面我们是如何应对的？这可能也是我们在这个国家应该具备的一个方面。在民主社会中，据说它是由宣传构成的，但那些会消失吗？所以，我认为我们应该思考，我们认为这是正确的。因此，我们提出了一个名为“煽动”的法律改革。

存在，在民主社会中，那就是尊重对方，享受初任，这是重要的。您怎么看？嗯，我有时会尝试一些不寻常的事情，您认为这很重要。是的，我们必须通过彼此同意来达成一部分协议，然后考虑将其作为前提。是的，这是关于午餐的。是的，但我们今天讨论民主的四个部门：行政、立法、司法。过去的事件，以及对今天正在处理的行政行为的处理。

是的，每次都与国会和未来发生关系。我们讨论了今天政治界就此达成的协议。我们知道，这是为了在未来得到理解。在一些国家，政治界讨论过去的一些事件，并讨论它们。但遗憾的是，没有关注未来的发展。即使是关于立法，我们似乎也主要关注对今天发生的事件进行制度性改进。即使已经过去20年、30年，我们还在与这些事件纠缠不清。为了创造一个社会，我们似乎还需要30年的时间。

我们今天讨论的危机、担忧、事业、新兴事物和课题，不是这些。朴勇宰，听了您现在所说的，是的，您们各位都非常节制，而且您们也触及了生态系统的主要关键词。嗯，您们通过说服。您们指出了我们有必要进行更深入的讨论，并指出了问题所在。我们还想介绍今天在场的国民代表金彩英。2010年10月31日，他退休了。因此，虽然很遗憾，先生。在我们国家，这不是学校，而是大学。

很多，照亮了。这三个国家的情况也大不相同。政治是积累社会成就的基石。经济也受到环境变化的影响。嗯，这似乎有点困难。即使一个人如此，人们也会在表达情感时。因此，国家也如此。嗯。我们认为，作为大选的基石，宪法。是的，好的。嗯，为了帮助我们纠正精神，我们进行了成功的努力。

啊，是的。为什么我要这样做？嗯，我不知道。我知道这只是一种思考方式。这是我在做出某项决定的过程中所做的。是的。我了解到，这是为了做出一些小的改变，比如把计划放在一边，或者把一天中的一些时间放在一边。所以，目前的这种正直，与其说是什么，不如说是我们为之奋斗的。所以，我认为，我将继续保持，我认为，这是为了更好的未来。

现在，哦，哦。啊，是的，没关系。过去，当国家权力被使用时，是的。我认为，人们可以客观地做到这一点。我认为我们正在这样做。是的，看起来不错。嗯，国会，然后从全球的角度来看，它们也以这种方式被表达出来。所以，是的，经济和社会也如此。嗯，好吧。嗯，是的。以及各种。是的。我认为是的。

嗯，现在。是的，这是一个时代。这怎么了？是的，这有点粗糙。我想看看。嗯，是的。所有的问题，所有的问题，所有的问题。嗯，这很重要。那么，从那里看到的呢？是的。这和我们社会的关系不大。是的。政治，特别是儒家，需要诚实地发言。我度过了很长时间。然而，这种情况正在改善。

嗯，政治应该发挥整合作用。二是政治本身。在某个社会中，它是否扮演着某种角色？根据社会发展的阶段，这种作用会消失。我们的国家也需要重新审视政治的作用和功能。所有事物都是如此。我们现在正在进入一个由全球环境问题驱动的政治运动。政治本身也应该如此。特别是经济和高龄化。

我对此抱有很高的期望。老实说，我想，即使权力的中心发生了变化，我们仍然需要考虑。嗯，政治权力。我不会争论这个。我认为政治应该能够召集。嗯。是的。社会正在走向分裂。它也可以引起冲突和矛盾。经济整合也是如此。我认为，政治研究本身。

我将介绍一个我喜欢的话。我认为，这是我们社会改革的核心。正如您所说，我认为，与我们过去的历史相比，这种情况有所改善。是的，我们正在努力实现经济繁荣。但如今，追求利益的社会。准备好这样做。这是我们社会的一项基本任务。我们认为，我们应该为下一代留下一个能够实现这种目标。他们似乎认为，如果政治能够实现这一点，他们也会做出贡献。

它没有统治，而是被控制了。你好。2.29。有很多人。那时，选举的投票率和结构必须统一。也许我们无法做到。然而，它必须以一种新的方式解决。我认为，民主在美国是最重要的。是的，我们可以做到。另外，还有多样性。

我没想到会这样。由于社会日益多样化，我们必须了解这一点。嗯，这不是一件容易的事。这是因为，正如我刚才所说，国会很少能达成一致。嗯，他们同意。是的。让我们拭目以待。这将会是一个组成部分。嗯，我想，您一直在分析。

这似乎是全面的升级。嗯，现在，政治。这似乎是真的。刚才我说得很清楚。我为我们国家感到骄傲。我们现在要开始。嗯，我们应该对此进行讨论。是的。先生，您怎么看？是的。是的，这是一个问题。是的。这是我们公司的问题。不是我们公司的。这是您个人的意见。但您也必须这样做。现在，我们正在报道，因为我们正在撰写文章。我们必须写更多。而且，我们正在思考。

然而，从目前的政治状况来看，我认为从2015年1月开始，情况已经恶化。因此，我们不应该使用“恶化”这个词。我们应该如何评价现状？事实上，我应该提前预测。例如，过去，当朝野发生冲突时，我们会非常紧张。因为，如果我们公开讨论朝野的冲突，就会引起争论。然后，在内部，我们会争论。然而，最近的情况又是如何呢？不。

我前面说了。是的，因为，我认为，这将是不可避免的。即使时间过去了，人们也无法做到。我认为，这是因为，无论内部还是外部，以及其他实际的，他们都无法做到。所以，我所说的是，民主本身，事实上，是多种多样的。但我认为，它是由少数人为了少数人而创造出来的。因此，我认为，如果社会恶化，它将变得更糟。

所以，最终，它会得到解决。因此，我认为，这应该得到解决。是的。虽然有些人会说，但这并没有发生。但是，政治界需要更多的包容和习惯。我认为，这是一种习惯。而且，我看到，我们取得了很多进步。是的。当然，我也看到了许多不尽如人意的地方。但总的来说，我认为，我们在进步。所以，我希望，我希望，我希望，我希望，我希望，我希望，我希望，我希望，我希望，我希望，我希望。

是的，现在。是的，先生。或者，先生。因此，是的。它是一种制衡。它不会是压倒性的。我们将做得更好。是的。我们认为。而且，为了不发生这种情况，我们必须做到。所以，我们必须考虑包容和尊重。先生，请您谈谈。您的意思是，我对此深有体会。大学里，我对自己说，社会很重要，英语也很重要。但是，我有一个问题。因此，我们应该问一下，教授。

我们不能从过去来看待现在。因此，我认为，我们必须向前看，而不是向后看。然而，我们认为，我们应该以这种方式去看待。但是，我们为什么这么做呢？这是因为，在这个时候，我们仍然在考虑如何做得更好。我认为，这是因为，民主本身，如果我们不思考，我们就无法解决问题。因此，我认为，这是一种必要的困境。

所以，我认为，我们必须努力实现这一点。是的。我认为，这是一个值得骄傲的时刻。我们一直在思考。因此，我们应该继续。我们认为，在过去几年里，民主经历了许多挑战。然而，我们仍然能够找到新的道路。我认为，这是因为，我们必须反思，我们所做的，以及我们所选择的。因此，我认为，这是一个非常重要的进展。

所以，我认为，我们必须在所有价值观和特质上反思。然后，我们才能看到未来的方向。是的。我认为，我们必须在过去和现在之间找到平衡。我们必须避免陷入民主的陷阱。是的。我们需要做得更好。是的。

然而，我认为，大韩民国是一个民主国家。是的。我们国家的人民，总是，我们很容易陷入歧途。我想，这就是原因。在日常生活中，我们看到的民主，只是停留在表面。我认为，我们必须尊重少数人的意见。我们必须能够考虑少数人的想法。在这方面，当我审视韩国的民主时，我认为，最近，我们似乎取得了一些进展。

然而，从这个角度来看，我们应该问，我们正在制定什么样的准则？我们正在阻止什么进入讨论？我认为，这是一个问题。因此，我们必须创造一个空间，让少数人的声音能够被听到。然后，通过充分的讨论，我们才能达成共识。这是一种罪恶。我们不能把问题推迟。有时，我们甚至不能谈论。我们正在制定标准。我们正在改变讨论本身。

那么，我们能否听到公众的意见？那些被排除在讨论之外的人，他们将如何参与？我一直在思考这个问题。因此，我认为，多样性，就像您刚才提到的，必须被接受。我们必须尊重对方，不能轻视对方。在这方面，我认为，韩国的讨论和对话，仍然是一个开放的环境。在这样一个不成熟的民主环境中，我们无法实现民主。我想说的是。因此，从外部来看，我们从小就受到的教育是，秩序、正义。我们必须建立一个更加完善的体系。

嗯，所以，先生，您在多数决定原则的方面，您认为，这是一个可以解决的问题。然后，我们进行了讨论。您认为，这是一种可能的模式吗？我认为，这是通过尊重对方来捍卫更好的民主。是的。您说了。关于第一个问题，我们得到了六位与会者的答复。我认为，他们都给出了坦诚的回答。这将使讨论更加丰富。

嗯，是的。为了节省您的时间，我将简要介绍一下。六位与会者都分享了他们的关键词。这些关键词是：包容、尊重、妥协、说服、理解、节制、说服、尊重。因此，我认为，如果您想补充任何内容，请随时发言。

而且，我们。是的。那么，议员们和记者们所说的，有哪些是您们赞同的呢？请在此处提供您的观点。您们是如何提问的？关于第二个问题，我听到了一些关于青年和妇女的声音。嗯。您们说过，公民社会的作用很重要。但是，现在，我们应该如何解决这个问题？因为，公民社会和政治是分开的。这又是一个问题。

是的，即使议员们想妥协，他们也会受到制约。首先，他们会收到很多批评。因此，我想，政治家们能够解决这个问题。并且，政治界也应该解决这个问题。请您帮助我们。我认为，这就是我们的时代。我今天所说的，是时代的转折点。这是一个动荡的时代。然而，政治却未能跟上时代的步伐。这似乎是一个问题。

嗯，这是一个短期解决方案。还有一个长期的解决方案。在两极分化的社会中，政治能否实现妥协？为了实现这一点，我们需要政治改革。我们需要一个更清晰的政治框架。我认为，这需要时间。政治家们也需要反思自己的行为。他们应该通过冲突来认识到这一点。我个人认为，这是我们社会面临的一个挑战。然而，尽管如此，有些人还是会坚持自己的观点。

不行。因此，政治改革，特别是国会，应该超越时代。它应该能够思考国家和社会。政治家们应该放下自己的私心，思考对社会最有利的东西。但是，即使如此，他们仍然会受到其他人的影响。我对此没有信心。因为，通过支持或反对某个候选人，他们会陷入极端。因此，他们会被卷入其中。然而，这仍然会引起冲突。

这是一个空间。当然，也有这样的机会。尽管如此，为了社会，即使不能连任，也要这样做。是的。而且，在这种情况下，他们会做出让步。因此，我认为，在教育领域，这是一个非常重要的课题。是的。是的。这是一个非常令人羞愧的问题。

无论谁的观点是100%正确的，这都是不对的。这不可能是正确的。因此，当政治家们进入政治领域时，他们能否实现妥协？我认为，那些不愿妥协的人，将会更加开放。因此，政治教育，我真的很希望，他们能够提出自己的改革方案。而且，他们也应该努力实现这些改革。我不知道，我不知道，我不知道。

当冲突发生时，我们如何才能解决呢？我们知道，这是最后的手段。但是，我们必须倾听对方的意见。我们如何才能理解？嗯，韩国，现在，我们将如何克服政治上的挑战？最终，我认为，我们必须在社会上达成共识。我们必须能够进行有意义的对话。只有这样，我们才能改变国家。我认为，这就是我们能够做的。我们需要为后辈创造一个更有利于政治的环境。我认为，在未来，我们就能实现统一。

This is a topic that started with cigarettes and alcohol. I haven't used * molecules. Yes, first push and open. It's natural to continue or be. We can know through senses. Yes, the professor put it in. Yes, in fact, the market is now. But where is it? Ah, the Soviet army needs to be deployed. This is the argument that it is needed. Hmm, it is to support the people of the Republic of Korea. But the foreign minister, the librarian, the bookshelf, the amazing things like this were heard. Is it 100 horses? No. The civilian vehicles were confiscated and the stocks were attended to, and they attacked. So the white people, their ambition, I can think of it as social justice.

He feels it when he opens the prison. When he spent a month, his middle age came. We called him out from this song's position. Even the ANC shirt and mask, the covenant, even the world gave him a reward. I think I was able to call my colleagues again to lecture. The representative's name is denied. It's an example. It's just a fortress, nothing is sent. People must stop such a huge amount. The letter is not a chicken, but a training. The formal master. So the monster was released. Finally, the newspaper oi, for the second time, free. Now, regarding Sudan, I was thinking about the internal technology. A person who is not a person.

So, according to the US time, the deceased president's intelligence, according to the text, can follow such a common theme. Then, click on the internal modification. But the ANC is twice. Oh, yes, there, in the two movements, spontaneously. Let's try it anywhere. Loud voices and radical ones. The PC is a torment. Progress is 3. Even if he thought of him as his successor, he maintained his personality. He served as a general. He asked me to sing. Thank you.

So, Gomtang, yes, he is working hard, 200,000 won. Leave it cold. 3. Almost 10,200 won for the rally. If you pick it up there, 4. Then it will be a real expenditure. It will be destroyed. Angela, our side has them. Even when they did something cool, there was. Or if you join a small action group, a friend for 5 years. A politician first, a big river. Didn't Mr. Bokji say it's not possible? Regarding Baek Seon-yeop's question, he laughed with tears. He thought of social justice. He's not going anywhere. It's like a island.

So, it's too strong, too strong, too strong, too strong, too strong, too strong, too strong, too strong, too strong, too strong, too strong, too strong, too strong, too strong, too strong. Kim Won-bong, about him. The direction he participated in will be. It's urgent, but we're sorry about his achievements. We can't help but feel sorry. It wasn't for art. It was a sensual thing. It's a control part. If it's him, it's 1. Ah, yes, 3. Why is this important to the residents? It's not that they're saying it's not. It's new. They received their faces. The war has already begun. Yes, that's right. It's not a soldier. They like to sell. They hate pleasure.

Hmm, all days are very important. Yes. If you think about catching the ball, there are people who can tell the truth. I regret it. If so, the president in 2009, 10 years ago, was it separate? You can live separately. But you can go further. To do that, the people must think. This is the most important thing now. How much is it? If you think about the meaning of the intellectuals who were brought here with such skill, it's time to think. How can we solve it? Have you ever forgotten? We came for that. We are explaining and talking about how to deal with the hardships until the end. This is what we think. So, the beautiful STX food is so small. The market is outdoors.

It becomes the green state I mentioned. I had surgery, but it was a great surprise. You must be faithful. You can explain it again by posting it. I, especially the competition, are not people who are different from others. So, when I can say something in a position of responsibility, I am experiencing the time. I think it's the truth that I was there. So I'll give you one card at a time. You should try it yourself.

So, I only know the internal situation. The local government contract is 2000. What is the meaning of it? Then, after thinking about the savior's medicine, it is necessary. This person, hmm, wrote it with the moon. It doesn't seem right. Ah, I put that tag in. So, welcome. With that attitude, if we do our work, the guide will guide the people first, not disappear. Politics does not guide. It is a negative politics. It is a violation of the people. It will be difficult for 5 to 10 years. If the believer doesn't go first, the ruling power, 10 countries in the world, will be pushed by a stick. So, I think politicians should be diligent. If they don't think suddenly, and then start with suspicion, we will be in trouble. Our politics will be in trouble. Communication is important. They say they do it with a pen. I am the one who relies on it. We must be diligent.

It must be done. Ah, to dig the earth, it is necessary to have the limits to want the uncomfortable truth. With the attitude of hiding, then someone can do it to themselves. It should be possible. It can have a positive impact on personal choices. You have explained it well. Now, let's move on to the second question. Yes, it seems like I've arrived at DS Lite. In politics, the major parties, the four major leagues, civil society is also politically divided. Extreme politics.

Compromise is needed more than words. To reduce wasteful political conflicts and reveal the implications, how should politics change? What should the representatives of the people prepare for sufficient discussion? This is the second question. You have given many examples and explanations. You will explain it in detail from Capri Tech. We need to think more carefully.

Of course, uh, huh. Yes. It's like a coordinate system. Of course, there's no way to get it. But it's much higher. So, for the sake of democracy and politics, people or forces who wear the mask of politics should quickly start with national issues. Ah, now it's time. You punish each other. Who overwhelms whom? This is how Israel started. We are making decisions for our lives. There is no domestic start either. We can reduce it a bit because of us.

So, in the system, the National Assembly, with the cooperation of the members, it can be a vacuum. Then, people who can learn something. Aren't they? Let's organize it as a new organization. What is the New Daily Society? Where is the space that can best be created? It's the place where the agitators and the people who are on the left are.

Regarding this, ah, uh, Samsung, huh? They protected them very quickly in the US. In that situation, even if it's a data-based established party, it's too much. Let's look at it. Eventually, when this animal needs to be done, it's like the weapon in my words. Can we improve something? Can we pass the bill by pushing it forward? Then we can evaluate it as a business. Now let's go into the calculation.

Ah, after it's over, we'll choose. Ah, the citizens, each one, will see everything right next to them. The media frames politics. So it's like that. It doesn't seem like people will live. If it's a public figure, then it will accelerate the replacement of the chocolate player. The state of liberation. The shock of preparation. Those who know that well.

I will explain. Because the focus is sharpened. You have explained it broadly. Hmm, 4, 3, 4, 4.5, 3, 0. When designating the topic, how should politics work to reach social consensus? We can get closer, but we can't practice it. Ah, there are two things. It must be revealed as a substitute. Hmm, there was a relative development of absolute standards. Ah, there are areas where we can discuss and compromise. If we cut the tail and ride it, can we compromise? This is what the fourth account thinks.

He was a person who liked the progress of intellect. Should he be prosecuted for not wanting to be in the dust? What did he think? SRS is here. Through the main division, we must be united. Otherwise, we will be exploited. We must continue to strive. Ah, 3. Related to the association. 4. It seems that we have no choice but to compromise. We have always adjusted the margins and taken responsibility. He came in with a large amount of work. It would be better to move forward.

If it's a bit of a bit, it's very interesting. It can't be interpreted as politics or international affairs. Compromise seems to be there. I will create a counter-politics against the politics of the opposition. So, together with the excessive options, I hope it doesn't become a burden. They say the company is wrong. But isn't it? As you are here, the budget of 55 trillion won is wrong. How will you create it? It is said that it will take tens of billions of won. How will you answer the question of whether to re-examine the boundaries?

The 6 AM stop is not a problem. How will we protect the diversity of our society? How will we defend the values that justice holds? This is necessary. Second, I think our politics should be realistic. I think Americans are standing in the morning and don't think politicians should be like that. Ah, I started politics because I thought it was a bad thing. This is Korea. I don't think so.

The majority of the suffering people, there is no time to practice the journey of 13 months. They should practice. They never do politics. I told the political reporters. Ah, so we are leaving out the time. They ate everything and came out. But there is still a lot of listening. They are busy. The National Assembly runs away in despair. Ah, oh, this danger is too far from reality. God, I'll give you more. Before I started politics, I was a prosecutor.

After starting politics and going to the National Assembly, there is no expansion of the prosecutor's office. It's a prosecutor. Ah, 10 o'clock. But our 5,000 citizens, what is their improvement? Citizens, you took the medicine. Yes, if you have 7, I can tell you about the plan for the sake of the people. I can tell you about the plan for the sake of the people. It takes 80 years of study and reading. If you look at the people in front of us, they have no money for 2 years. Everything is happening. Charles M. He's wearing armor now.

It becomes life. If they are unfairly dismissed, they live like this. Ah, they dismissed me. But in the plenary session of the Japanese Diet, they are protected by the stabilization system. I think politics should be helpful. I think it's a matter of life and death. It's not about ideology, but about life. If you approach it with a life-oriented approach, it's better to have administration guided by politics. It's possible. 4. The pursuit of power. If you are not in the position of the sun, you will be confirmed.

It will be a general meeting. If something happens, they think it won't work. They realize the politics they should do and make it practical politics. Then, can it create social conflict? I think so. They know the answer but can't practice it. Ah, 100 characters. They will come back again. So, from the current politics, they will look at the university students. Ah, hmm. To match the public's standards, what did we do? Woo, based on simple things. Even if it's a simple thing, it's a second question. Before the second question, I agree with what you said about the improvement. And the truth is that it has become a formal explanation.

When you think of it, people really trust and live with trust. Everyone feels this and gradually looks at politics. Why is it in the newspaper? It's true that they're all selling. And they are a little biased. I think they are thinking about it. It's like a culture. So, I think I should go back to the original idea and think. You said it was very touching. So, I want to move to the next level. What is it to do this? I thought about it from the perspective of the elders.

And we have to play our role. At first, when I come, all the reporters think. We have to develop policies. But later, we only write sensational articles. Why is that? Because they don't invest in the media. So, when policy articles are interesting, they are limited. People who claim to be disasters and argue that the opposition party is changing. Even within the party, if they stay still, those articles that seem like policy articles will be difficult to write. But through the grand ceremony, what they say is not true, but they can also be considered as internal information. It is said that if there are tens of thousands of people, these things will be shaken.

If this loop is not maintained, it will be difficult for those who think so. Of course, they have to think big. They have expertise. But if the ruling party is there and the opposition party is there, it's not simple. Those facts are simplified for all people. So, although there may be various difficulties in not being able to do even one thing, I think that if the members of the National Assembly can act with conviction, the opposition will not be discouraged. Why is it given? There are many reasons.

It can be, but from my perspective, it can be an opportunity to disrupt it. So, those things are a moment that doesn't help us move forward. I was deeply impressed by the meeting. We can't know. Yes. Thank you. At 8 o'clock. It seems like it will be a bit of a fever. Can we avoid it? How can we do this? Ah, it's not Twitter, is it? If it continues, please continue to ask this question. What are the people preparing for the election? You have explained it well. And in fact, about the discussion. To be honest, the most important thing is the index.

When that happens, the president said, I will do it with my family. So, by practicing those things in practice, we have to answer the social problems. From that day on, I thought about it. If it's too much, it's not enough. For example, how is the information society established? The general scope, the author's section, there are too many. I thought, for example, I studied one company, but the National Assembly Act itself is also for the National Assembly to change itself. It's about the meaning of the National Assembly. It's about the members' problem. So, this kind of authoritarian government's democracy is still remaining. It's a problem, isn't it? If that system is improved, regardless of the ruling and opposition parties for several years, the National Assembly itself.

The community itself can open up more, and I think we need to think more about the basics. And eventually, we need about 5 items, but the people's rhythm is also important. In the process of our immediate communication, there are methods that have been used for a long time, but they haven't been able to speak. Yes, I also went to the experience of the analytical materials. I was scolded for not meeting the opposing businesses. I had to go. It was like a complaint. It was like a complaint. Thank you.

4. In the long term, it's a wasteful model. In the short term, how can we avoid it? Is it not necessary? The problem is raised. Systemic improvement is needed. This is what we couldn't do. We discussed it. Politics is a problem. I think it's a role to solve problems and create many points. Is the current political problem in Korea on the ground? What are they doing in the field?

When I look at it, I think the politicians don't want to reach an agreement, as mentioned in the question. So, I thought about how dangerous and risky it is for politics to change. I thought about it. We have to create the system.

In that sense, I thought it was necessary to forcibly engage in dialogue. 2. When engaging in dialogue, we need to exclude systems and tools that can be easily understood and ignored. Of course, when we do politics, we need to consider the appropriate problems to solve them, and always be 100% satisfied with the proposals. We have to organize it and judge it. But I think Korea is not lost in the efficiency of politics. Therefore, we are trying to exclude dialogue itself. We are not trying to do it. For example, even the prosecution reform is not necessary right now. When else? I think we are trying to unlock the dialogue. Can the other person's story be accepted? I don't think we are doing it.

It seems like such systems will change. Then, where do these systems come from? I think the political situation itself is very complex. It's hard for the ruling and opposition parties to play their roles. The president is divided into pro-presidential and anti-presidential factions. Then, the various contents that can exist between them are ignored. This is not a matter of ruling and opposition parties. It is the diversity of our entire society.

I thought so. In that sense, I think we should start with constitutional amendment. I am organizing it. Whether we learn politics in the current political situation or change something, it will eventually lead to the president's subordinates and politics will be corrupted. The president makes decisions based on the number of subordinates. The position of the president does not lead to dialogue and compromise. In a democratic society where dialogue and compromise are important, where should we start? I thought about where the diversity of Korea is concentrated. So, in that sense, although they talked about political struggles without alternatives, in this situation where the value is important, how can we play our role properly with expertise and create a university-level administration that can be compared to the president's level?

In that situation, can we create a university-level administration that can be compared to the president's level? What can we do now? When we consider that, by killing them again, it might not be beneficial. Let's focus on expertise and then match the political axis. Then, we should agree and then take various measures.

Of course, the alternative system should also be meaningful. And on the other hand, first, if so, then second, the people's table. It will be a time when the people's table is brought to our politics. I think so. We ride, for example, when we are in the basic stage. Sometimes, dialogue and political issues arise from various places. Of course, it's not the entire society, but I feel that way. When that happens, was it possible because of this system and this culture? I think so. When I go home and think about it, how much are the citizens' attitudes towards politics? Are they engaging in political issues? Are they also playing political experiments?

It is not creating such a situation. And I think that the young people in their 20s are afraid, so they are disappearing even more. We must be vigilant. If there is no possibility of cooperation, there is no room for it. So, at some point, the person who can do politics will rise to the level of politics. But when I talk with my friends,

Ah, we will create a different world. Otherwise, in such a system, dialogue is also uncomfortable. In this situation, should the political world and the current situation be returned to our points? I thought so. In that sense, the attitude of politics, and the tolerance of dialogue. You said that the war in the professional world is raging, but is it really being created by the National Assembly and the violent words? Where does the media start? I thought about it. In that sense, the political world is not using it at all. The media creates it.

When you look at it, it's not. The media and the politicians are taking the current political situation and providing it to the public as a frame. In that sense, it's understandable why politics is so divided. It's not that they don't want to talk. They don't want to talk. They don't want to talk. You have given us ideas. We have reached the second question. We have 7 minutes. So, I will listen first.

The title of the book is 'The Politics of Daehan'. So, the National Assembly members know politics and society. It's about the content. When I looked at the content, you said that democracy is gathered. You must have seen a lot of injustice. So, politicians in Korea are very similar. The gentlemen in politics, professors, businesses. They can't do it. They temporarily take charge. And then, the leader's will, even if it's the US, is not afraid of it, is it? They eat and live, and their leadership is very strong. Now, it's being pushed.

Because of that, we must be awakened. Then, why is that? When analyzing it, they say that the ethnic issue in American society and the important issues of freedom have been resolved. But they must be resolved within the style. The Korean society emerged and politics and society became alienated. In fact, when we look at the politics now, we don't hide racial issues. When we read the articles these days, we talk about Korean society. But the ethnic issue is divided. This is not resolved in our society. This structure. The political world uses it to win the election, but is it not because it is not resolved? Is it because it is being covered up? Can it be resolved by that person's face? And the political world is like that.

So, as mentioned earlier, the political system must be remembered. But if the number of people monopolizes it, it's not like that. Can the political world solve social conflicts? It will be very important. Ah, yes. I have another question. The majority of the people are like a swarm of bees. They use it for a long time. First, the members of the National Assembly, the representatives of the people, can be vulnerable. When there is such a feeling, we talk about it even if we know it. Especially the members of the National Assembly think so. They forget that communicating with the people and the residents is a very important duty. They say they are like a general.

The festival is recognized, but they do not recognize that they communicate with the people on a daily basis. It has become a serious problem. Ah, and it is very, uh, it is said that it is clean and reasonable. But it is different from the composition. Now, they have performed their personal excellence. Then, how will they receive the people's opinions? They have to rely on that person's words. Recently, I had a school budget problem in a certain region.

So, when I talked with the member of the National Assembly in charge, I was wondering if it was originally impossible. So, I thought, if I agree, then I should not agree. There must be various opinions, both for and against. But can this be resolved through an objective process and fair procedures? I asked if they were designing and proceeding with that process. And if they were securing their political legitimacy through that. I thought about what role they play as a coordinator and a facilitator. But in reality, the members of the National Assembly, the political system, and the operating principles are not well-trained.

So, we are full of despair about this. But it's not like that. When new politics are made, whether it's a survey or the National Assembly, they listen to people's opinions. And they don't break it. When they are there, they seem to be conducting a lot of progress. I thought so. We have 30 minutes. Is it enough? Yes, yes. Two more. Yes, yes.

Ah, I think it's a company that analyzes it. I would like to start with the improvements. I would like to give you a brief explanation. Ah, yes. Ah, the parents of the young people are looking at the sales. Yes, that's right. 1. Now, it's time to consume the era. It's the passing of the examination. They have to be honest with the system. I tried to improve it. But it was too late.

Ah, I think it's a company that analyzes it. I would like to start with the improvements. I would like to give you a brief explanation. Ah, yes. Ah, the parents of the young people are looking at the sales. Yes, that's right. 1. Now, it's time to consume the era. It's the passing of the examination. They have to be honest with the system. I tried to improve it. But it was too late.

Socialists' younger brothers are more destructive. Is that right? Ah, yes. Ah, now 3, 2, yes. Ah, study and student movement. Ah, it starts from 2. And at the age of 40, at the forefront, you have to ski and breathe. This story. Many people have done it. So, I hope you think about it. Yes. Let's learn the basics again. So, I don't know about those two people.

I gave it to the second year company. Yes. Please give me the details. The government's work is that the people are vulnerable. I thought it was cooler. Even if it's expensive, it's probably better received. That's the democratization. I talked about the Salvation Army. If you have a strong scent, you can find the most brilliant recognition in the North American continent.

I made a reservation for a big person. People are like that. They encounter big events. The director of the Philanthropy Department, one of the important directors. Even if he's a bit rough, he follows. Ah, really, that son. He went to Korea. So, he must have had a strong friendship. He must avoid it. It's five o'clock. It has to be hot. Ah, suddenly, the children's aspirations. They want to be politicians. So, our politics has various issues. It's happening now.

Have you ever thought about it? Yes. That color. The master of reason. Who is the president at that time? Add more. Even if you know, you don't know. That choice. When playing the law, intervention. It's done. The whole nation, after ten years. Okay. Like this. If you starve for this country, maybe you will become interested in the country. In the post-war period, it has only been a year since the country was founded. When the budget was spent on the Gyeongbu Expressway, what did Korea do in a bright state? The foundations were laid.

It's not good, but let's push it forward. It must be managed completely. The politicians have seen such experiences. Korea is struggling because of this. Even though it has only been 70 years, it has been 10 years. For the future, the foundation was laid. If the president had not made that choice, would it have been possible to enter the semiconductor, the internet, the game, the healthcare? Why is the opposition party so important?

So, politicians can understand this. Even if they establish a process and guidelines, they need to be separated. But now, dialogue is needed. Can a person with such courage manage it? It's not a matter of 10 years. It's been more than 10 years since Korea was founded. The president's politics. It's like that. It won't work, right? 157. I understand. In 60 years, will the descendants be okay? Like us, will the presidents be okay?